Friday, February 4, 2011

MORE JOBS OR MORE QUESTIONS - BLS DATA OR JUST BS?

Apparently I wasn't the only one that thought the "jobs" report was a little suspect. Please enjoy this video from David Stockman the former Director of the OMB.  He is a regular on CNBC and he completely discounts much of the improvement in the economy and employment.  Fast forward to around 3:00 in the interview.  It is well worth your time.

Specifically, he points out that we are not adding enough jobs to keep up with population growth AND we have less employed folks working than when the recession ended.



Stockman calls into question the use of QE and the remarks that the FED is responsible for all the commodity inflation.  David calls for some sanity in the markets and really suggests that we are in some deep trouble ("and it won't be in 3 years").


GOATMUG

JOBS - 16.1% UNEMPLOYMENT?

I think Rick Santelli from CNBC has an entertaining rant about the jobs report.  Enjoy.

As of 1:13 today the Dow is now up, isn't it great to invest in a market where securities never go down?



GOATMUG

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

CHINA - GREAT BIG LOVEABLE PANDA OR BLOOD THIRSTY BEAR?

Lately I've been doing more writing and have been highlighting the battle that is being waged in the economy.  In my recent article Inflation Bombs, I discussed how the US central bank was using dollar devaluation to inflate assets (stocks and commodities).  The next major post highlighted the Japanese experience with deflation in Why Aren't We Turning Japanese
The key takeaway in these posts is that our US FED has opted to inflate assets and the by-product of that choice is a flood of speculative dollars deployed throughout the world.  The result of the deluge has been massive increases in commodity prices, tougher living conditions for the poor and retired, and an increase cost of living for US and world citizens. 

I received a few comments from a reader the other day and the basic thrust of his comments were that China and the emerging economies were an easy choice for us to make when compared to the recessionary economy of the US.  While there is part of me that agrees with him fully we need to make a distinction between "economy" and stock or commodity investing targets (of course time frame is important too).  My statement is made clear as we examine the chart below and see that the FXI has dropped some 11% from it's recent highs in November. 



FUNDAMENTAL VIEW
From a fundamental long term perspective I think the reader has the correct investment thesis (of course I like it because I've had it and traded on it for the last 18 months!).  However, the short-term in China has me taking a pause because the charts are telling me that we are at an inflection point.  We'll talk about those technical trading markers in a second.  First though, I'll put China in the same basket as all the other emergings that I like. 

POSITIVES
Relative Low Employment Costs (to Europe or the US)
Little Environmental Protection Regulation
Excellent Demographics (Growing Middle Class)
Fast Growing Economy

NEGATIVESQuestionable Rule of Law (Legal Rights and Copy-Right enforcement)
Closed markets to foreign firms
Inflation (Wages)
Inflation (Land)
Inflation (Raw Materials)
Inflation (Food)

If you are getting the point that I'm most concerned about inflation in the emerging world, you'd be right.  We don't need to look further than Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, Yemen and Oman to see that poor, unemployed, youth ultimately rise up and look to change the leadership and rules of the land.  The food inflation and poor employment may have been the final straw that broke that cause the Tunisians and Egyptians to revolt, but these are real issues that we must examine in our favorite countries like Singapore, Malaysia, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Chile, India, and Indonesia.  To clarify, I tend to think that China is further along in its emergence than the others that I've listed, and in fact is now had such an improvement that it is losing manufacturing business to the other Tigers because wage costs are increasing in the mainland.

I think the story I found here describes the wage situation in China quite well.
- http://business.globaltimes.cn/china-economy/2011-01/617201.html

The story describes a situation where living costs are now growing at such a clip that workers are simply walking out of their jobs and not returning from their Chinese New Year holiday since wages are not enough to pay their living expenses.  The impact of this is that manufacturers are being forced to delay shipments to the world (for useless junk we don't need).  This means that US retailers can't get the products that they have ordered.  Finally, the Chinese government is attempting to force wages up with regulations requiring minimum greater minimum wages.  In time, this will help and will create a huge domestic economy --- the economy all of the US multi-nationals have all been dreaming of for the last 20 years (remember Dell salivating about making manufacturing plants in China in the late 90's).  This future huge economy is what I've discussed for a while as the reason for investing in the emerging markets.  I've said it a few times, there will be really big draw downs, but in 20 years we'll be giving each other high fives for investing in these gems.




OK, THAT'S A GREAT LONG TERM VIEW, BUT WHAT ABOUT NOW?  - TECHNICAL TRADING UPDATE
Take a look at the two charts above, but let's start with the the colorful black one right above this section.  What we see here is that FXI has pretty significant support at $42 and overhead resistance at $47.  The biggest concern we have is the lower channel trend line that was recently broken last week.  This action to me spells further weakness.  If the $42 area of support breaks FXI could easily trade down to $36 ---- (another 15% or 20% from here).

Finally, examine the upper chart.  I use this chart to examine the 14 day EMA and the 40 day EMA on a weekly chart.  Typically when we see the breakthrough of the 14 day EMA below the 40 day EMA it is a harbinger of doom!  (ok, that may be a bit dramatic, but it isn't a positive).  For me, when this signal appears it signal is a longer term sign that the trend has turned negative.  Let me be clear, it has not crossed below yet, but when it does, it may be a great opportunity to short.   I've posted many articles about this signal in the past, one of the best has been VLO where it signaled a positive move up when the stock was in the $18 - $19 area in November 2010.  That signal (along with good fundamentals) has proved to be an awesome long term trade.

Keep watching, but with continued inflationary forces bruising the Chinese economy along with a confirmation of the 14 day EMA/40 day EMA crossover, I'd be inclined to trade this.

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

WHY AREN'T WE TURNING JAPANESE? JAPANESE DEFLATION REVISITED

Please review the Bloomberg story - http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-13/japan-exporting-deflation-reveals-meaning-of-bernanke-s-economic-nightmare.html

In the last post titled Economic Warfare - Inflation Bombs (Part 1) -  I outlined how the US leadership was attempting to create asset price inflation (stock markets up) in an attempt to change perception and create a state of "feeling better" which actually changes reality so that the economy's participants act in ways that spur improvement and thus makes the economy "better".

The mechanism of this "feel better" cocktail is the use of QE or Quantitative Easing which is simply where the Fed and Treasury "print" electronic dollars and buy US Treasuries from the open market.  Essentially the hope is that this exchange of dollars floods banks and other investors with cash.  In the case of banks, the hope is that they will lend money to borrowers that will then do projects that stimulate the economy and create jobs.  Investors are "encouraged" to buy other things like stocks with their treasury proceeds.    The tidal wave of new dollars has done exactly what the Fed has desired in that the purchases of stocks and other assets have increased substantially in value since the low of March 2009.

As I covered, those same dollars haven't just bought stocks, they bought commodities like gold, silver, oil, wheat, cotton, sugar, cocoa, copper, and every other hard and soft asset.  The by-product of this has been a surge in prices for these commodities.  Read my article for more on the impact of those price increases.

So, to summarize and get to the point of this post, the Fed gambit has succeeded so far in getting stocks up and the economy moving forward.  As Ben Bernanke has highlighted many times, deflation is the ultimate enemy, it was the cause of the Great Depression and some say it was the cause for WWII as well.  Since he is an expert in that economic period, he has vowed to defeat it at any cost.  The cost literally has been in the trillions to accomplish this feat.

There is also one other thing going on in the back ground.  Our government (Bush and Obama) attempted their own fixes in concert with the Fed.  These fiscal  approaches included massive government spending to counter act the decline in personal consumption and spending.  Of course the US government didn't have all the money for the additional trillions it was spewing out, so it created massive deficits and that trend continues today.  What is important to note here is that this massive outflow of government spending and surge in debt now must be paid for in the form of treasury obligations.  So, not only is the Fed buying US government debt for the sake of sparking an asset rally, it is also purchasing the debt of the US due to significant cost over runs.  The amount we owe is so large that we are now sensitive to any increase in interest rates that come from an erosion of the quality of creditworthiness.  Here is the money shot - The US Fed now really has this dual policy mandate (that is unspoken) - 1)  Keep the markets up so the recovery can be sustained   2)  For goodness sake don't let interest rates rise cause we can't pay the cost of interest on our borrowed principle.

So after that very long introduction we know that there is a WAR ON DEFLATION.  So what is the problem with deflation?  What happens to consumers in a deflationary environment?  Let's examine the story about Japan's experience to see what scares Bernanke so much.

  • "Their advantage may be Japan’s disadvantage. Prices in Japan as measured by the gross domestic product deflator have declined almost without interruption since 1994. That has muted the effect of falling wages and provides a cautionary tale for Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, who has been lecturing on deflation’s perils as a central banker since 2002. "
Ok, so since 1994 prices have declined in Japan for everything from shirts to hamburgers.  Anything bad there?  Let's read on to see. 
  • “Retailers like Uniqlo were able to ride the wave of deflation and grow,” said Yoshimasa Maruyama, a senior economist at Itochu Corp. in Tokyo. “To win these pricing wars at home, companies had to keep cutting workers’ pay, and that’s spiraled down with prices falling and then falling some more, with deflation never ending.”

The article's point here is that the company did cut wages to attempt to compete in the environment.  Therefore, if my wages are cut it must be terrible right?  Actually, if my wages are cut, but all the things I buy are less then I don't really feel it as much.  It seems like Martin Shulz agees.

  • “Everyone knew deflation was bad for jobs and bad for the economy, but gradually, households and companies just got used to it,” said Martin Schulz, a former Bank of Japan researcher and now senior economist in Tokyo at Fujitsu Research Institute. “The risk is that it takes hold in the U.S. as well.”
Admittedly there are negatives.  Companies just don't cut prices, they cut headcount to complete.  But where does the notion come from that deflation is bad in the article? 

  • ‘Unavoidable Endgame’

    Deflation will steadily sap nominal growth, depriving the government of revenue, until one day Japan will no longer be able to finance its borrowing, Jerram said. The country will either default on a debt of about twice the size of the economy or debase its currency to reduce the real value of liabilities.

    “That’s the unavoidable endgame,” said Jerram, who has analyzed the Japanese economy since 1987. “As long as it’s in the future, everybody can pretend it’s someone else’s problem.”
I laugh when I read that text.  Yes, the unavoidable endgame is that the government defaults or devalues IF they continue to have stupid government spending on useless building projects (bridges to nowhere), entitlements, and stimulus spending that achieves nothing!  Sound familiar?  Japan is the future of Amerika!  The endgame is unavoidable if governments continue to have huge fiscal deficits and don't control themselves.  This is where we see the sheer terror of Bernanke and other government leaders.  Delfation is a killer if you have an out of control government that doesn't manage spending appropriately.  How many times have we heard that governments will actually downsize and cut costs?  NEVER!  In fact, the US government builds in annual increases into the budget that do not need to be approved.  So every department's budget grows automatically every year.  That includes salaries and base expenditures!  No wonder we cannot control the power and cost creep of the government!

The takeaway here is that deflation is bad if you are a government official.  Otherwise you'll see that Japan's style of deflation isn't quite as horrible as it is cracked up to be.    Consumers (normal people) actually feel fine with deflation.

  • The success of the companies in Japan has helped consumers adjust to deflation. The average household owns 1.4 cars and 2.4 color televisions, about a quarter more than in 1990, a Cabinet Office survey shows. The proportion of people content with their standard of living was 63.9 percent last year, compared with 63.1 percent in 1989, a government report said.
Contrast the information above with the choice that your federal government and Federal Reserve is making.  They would rather declare war on the retired and poorest US citizens by invoking the spirit of inflation.  Bernanke demands rising prices in gasoline, oil, clothing, and food and those costs become a larger portion of the poorest income --- just to survive!  The middle class are squeezed to death in the spiral of surging prices.  The Fed claims that wages will increase and jobs will be created, but where is the data to support this?  Where are the rising wages?  Where are the jobs?   I've highlight again the statement from above -
  • The country will either default on a debt of about twice the size of the economy or debase its currency to reduce the real value of liabilities.
The reality is that the government and the Fed has chosen not to cut the size of our government and it's entitlements, but has chosen to debase our currency.  The debasement of the currency amounts to the crushing of our poor and also the poor of the world through price inflation (because commodities are priced in dollars).  I wonder how long the Amerikan poor and middle class will put up with these attacks.  When will the rioting of Egypt and Tunisia come to the streets of our cities?  If you think the trend of higher prices in food is going to abate you are absolutely wrong.  If you think we won't see $4 gas this summer you are nuts!  Good or bad, Amerikans are soft and don't have the heart to stand up to these overt attacks by government elites.  Where is the America I grew up in?

Would you rather choose starving to death, being on the government foodstamp roles, and losing your independence and dignity or choose this?

  • “It’s amazing what you can buy with 100 yen now, we didn’t have 100-yen stores before,” said Sachiko Enokida, 80, who lives on her bimonthly pension checks from the government and has witnessed inflation’s ups and downs since the 1940s. “After the war, we all thought this was going to be the last year before we starved. Then things really boomed and people were buying apartments like crazy and you saw wealth everywhere. I would hate for things to get expensive again.”
    With almost one fourth of the population over 65 years old, Japan chose to stay in deflation, said Feldman. That turned cash into an investment, as money left in bank deposits gained in purchasing power the longer it stayed there. Today, Japanese households keep 56 percent of their financial assets in cash, compared with 14 percent in the U.S.

    “The factors that produced and permitted deflationary policy seem likely to persist,” Feldman said in a report.
    Meanwhile, consumers continue to enjoy lower prices. Golfers pay 26,800 yen to play on the weekend with a caddy at Oak Hills Country Club, a course 90 minutes’ drive from central Tokyo designed by Robert Trent Jones Jr. Twenty years ago, the fee was about 40,000 yen, said Katsutoshi Ohira, acting manager.

    “I don’t think I can expect any meaningfully big pay raises going ahead,” said Satoshi Miyazaki, 34, who works for an advertising company in Tokyo. “Since I’m paying for things out of my limited salary, lower prices have been a great help.”

There is going to be a collapse in Japan too, don't get me wrong.  Both countries have pursued poor policies that didn't include government cuts.  Both countries continued to borrow and live in the moment rather than in a mode of planning for the future.  My point here is simply that Bernanke and the Fed have picked the option that benefits the US government, banks, and elites rather than the US citizen.  They have picked themselves over the us.

GOATMUG

      

    Monday, January 31, 2011

    WALK LIKE AN EGYPTIAN?

    As many readers know I've been highlighting the activities of the Fed and how those actions impact the US and the world.  In the 2011 Outlook I emphasized how the exporting of inflation would cause oil and gas to go much higher and how food would also be impacted as a result. 

    Over the last week we have seen the media blitz as Tunisia and Egyptian riots have boiled over due to poor economic conditions like high unemployment, poor wages, and the rising cost of food.  Tunisia has overthrown their leadership and it appears as though Egypt will also have new leadership.

    The coming changes in Egypt have me wondering what is next.  To assist readers, I've included a link here to Stratfor which is an organization that is made up of former intelligence officers that now sell market and world intelligence to Wall Street and other buyers.  They have a very informed group that has great insight in world politics and economics.  The 8 minute video is worth watching.

    http://www.stratfor.com/analysis/20110128-agenda-george-friedman-egypt 


    There is a ton of great stuff in the interview, but I think the money shot here is that he says that the events in Egypt are of "towering consequence".  In other words, "THIS IS BIG".  The drama that unfolds there is so interesting because it unveils the conflicting US position where we support strong-men dictators while championing democracy.  This is just another opportunity to see how ill prepared Obama (and Hillary Clinton) is to understand and deal with the real-world dynamics of foreign policy.  The truth is that the US and Israel have implemented successfully a strategy of playing on the divisions of the people in the Middle East for many years.  Think about it, we look to take advantage of the differences between Arabs and non-Arabs, and we play to the divide between Sunnis and Shiites.  A homogeneous Middle East dominated by a common "democratically elected" Islamic movement is absolutely not in the best interest of the US, or probably the world.  I hope that there is a skillful way for the US to continue to play this game, we absolutely need adept diplomatic leadership now.
    I also have a few take aways that I've been thinking about over the weekend;

    A change of leadership in Egypt probably ushers in a more overt role by the military.

    Muslim (Islamist) elements will gain a larger presence within the government.  (Remember, these guys don't have to be the President to impact the direction of the state.  They can simply write laws that steer the country in new directions)

    The border with Israel is of great concern.  Remember, Egypt has played a major role in containing the Palestinians by having a "sealed" border.  A government that is more sympathetic to the Palestinians could mean instability for Israel.

    The broader question is whether or not the spread of unrest stops in Egypt.  If a change of power is made, I believe that it will incite others to attempt to try.  The reality is that if new countries are swept up in the move to overthrow current leadership, things could become very nasty and bloody as leaders look to put down to the revolts.  Oman is certainly a place to look for this to occur.  I've heard that perhaps a move like this may take place in Syria as much of the country is not Islamic yet the government is run by the  minority (I don't believe this will happen).  As demonstrators have more success, I look for other countries full of disenfranchised youth to try to "Walk Like an Egyptian".

    GOATMUG